--- description: Få detaljeret information om reqSuite® rm fra verificerede brugererfaringer lige fra anvendelighed, egenskaber, pris, fordele og ulemper. Læs anmeldelser, og find lignende værktøjer takket være Capterra Danmark. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: reqSuite® rm: pris, anmeldelser og vurderinger – Capterra Danmark --- Breadcrumb: [Startside](/) > [Software til kravstyring](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [reqSuite® rm](/software/162954/reqsuite) # reqSuite® rm Canonical: https://www.capterra.dk/software/162954/reqsuite Page: 1 / 3\ Næste: [Next page](https://www.capterra.dk/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) > Blandt de førende RM-værktøjer til innovative mellemstore virksomheder – nemt at bruge, kraftfuldt, kan tilpasses fuldt ud og er hurtigt implementerbart > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 35 users. Top-rated for **Sandsynlighed for anbefaling**. ----- ## Overview ### Hvem bruger reqSuite® rm? Virksomheder fra en lang række brancher sætter deres lid til reqSuite® rm. Takket være den enkle og omfattende konfigurerbarhed kan softwaren hurtigt og fuldstændigt tilpasses en hvilken som helst kundesituation. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Samlet** | **4.6/5** | 35 Anmeldelser | | Brugervenlighed | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundesupport | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Værdi for pengene | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Egenskaber | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Sandsynlighed for anbefaling) | ## Om leverandøren - **Virksomhed**: OSSENO Software GmbH - **Location**: Kaiserslautern, Tyskland - **Founded**: 2014 ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: Selvstændig, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Sky, SaaS, Web-baseret, Windows (Lokalt) - **Supported Languages**: engelsk, fransk, tysk - **Available Countries**: Belgien, Bulgarien, Canada, Danmark, Estland, Finland, Frankrig, Irland, Island, Israel, Italien, Letland, Liechtenstein, Litauen, Luxembourg, Nederlandene, Norge, Polen, Portugal, Rumænien and 7 more ## Egenskaber - Adgangskontrolelementer/tilladelser - Budgettering/udarbejdelse af prognoser - Dokumentstyring - Livscyklusstyring - Opgavestyring - Prioritering - Samarbejdsværktøjer - Sporing af opgavefremskridt - Styring af arbejdsgange - Styring af krav - Styring af ændringer - Versionskontrol ## Integrations (10 total) - Azure DevOps Server - ClickUp - Enterprise Architect - GitLab - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Redmine - TestRail ## Support Options - Mail/support - Ofte stillede spørgsmål/forum - Videnbase - Telefonsupport - Chat ## Category - [Software til kravstyring](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Relaterede kategorier - [Software til kravstyring](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [ALM Software](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [PLM Systemer](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## Alternativer 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.dk/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3680 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.dk/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 3. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.dk/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2988 reviews) 4. [monday dev](https://www.capterra.dk/software/1048457/monday-dev) — 4.6/5 (65 reviews) 5. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.dk/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) ## Anmeldelser ### "Easy, flexible Customer Support and good value for Requirements Engineering\!" — 5.0/5 > **Leon** | *10. november 2025* | Medicinsk udstyr | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Great Customer Support, we got a very good package from the start as an early stage company and was greatly supported by \[sensitive content hidden\] himself. Especially for lean teams the software is very good suited, we worked with very holistic PLM tools before which would be an overkill for our team size. Team Collaboration works very good as well. > > **Ulemper**: The software could improve regarding usability and certain functionalities are not directly clear but apart from that we are happy with it. > > We are very happy to work with the ReqSuite team and their flexibility to react and find practical solutions. ----- ### "Easy to Use Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Kevin** | *20. februar 2026* | Design | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Reqsuite is a great value with alot of capability for a very value oriented price. Some tools may have slightly more capabilities but have significantly more expense. The tool is quite intuitive to use overall and provides a great level of traceability. > > **Ulemper**: The ability to order created items in a drag/drop order is limited and can only be done via folders. This is a new feature that has been requested but is the largest challenge. > > The overall experience has been great. The support and answering questions has been very supportive overall. The tool is quite intuitive and most users are able to navigate it effectively with a basic level of training. ----- ### "Poor user experience" — 1.0/5 > **Ilona** | *12. december 2024* | Informationsteknologi og -tjenester | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Methodology behind seems to be quite good, but the implementation is poor. Excel import/export is quite good as it allows me not to use ReqSuite. > > **Ulemper**: Terrible user experience - opening tickets only in one window - time consuming to do anything, several seconds to open another/parent ticket, no sensible tracking of dependencies (only direct links, so the most important info like full decomposition of requirements to system function or cross-dependenciess are not available) - everything needs to opened one by one which again takes time. Discussion/comment section is so tiny... Navigation in ticket detail is confusing and very annoying - when I open the detail in 1-window system, the search list is no longer visible until closing/minimizing the detail. Strange behaviour when updating decomposed issues - when I update one, it freezes the whole structure and it is not possible to work with them until it it propagates everything (which can take anything from 10s - 3mins) > > In short - very bad user experience and very unefficient tool for managing requirement. One-window is very 1995-like feature. Requires to spend hours and hours to manage simple structure this way. Use JIRA or Confluence instead... ----- ### "ReqSuite - easy to use, good features" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *5. maj 2025* | Vedvarende energi og miljø | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Easy to use, simple structure you can tailor to your needs. Great support from Osseno. Fast response to questions and issues. Onboarding process was smooth, efficient and helped us structure our product/requirements relationships. > > **Ulemper**: Some issues with the screen resolution. Minor issue that the responsible person for each requirement is not fixed and sometimes changes depending on the requirement state and user account rights (but this is already being worked on by Osseno for a future update) > > Great experience, so far. Moved to ReqSuite RM from excel and it has completely changed how we are able to record and track changes for our complex requirements set. The tool gives us all the features we need for this and is even adjustable enough for us to use for other related tasks such as FMECA, HAZID, etc. Simple to use which helps as we grow into our use of the tool. ----- ### "ReqSuite - a good choice" — 5.0/5 > **Manfred** | *25. januar 2021* | Forbrugerelektronik | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fordele**: The features that ReqSuite offers are so impressive for us because we can map our business processes almost 100%, without changes, due to the high configurability of the software. After a short training ReqSuite is described by the employees at BORA as easy to use. In our research and development department, ReqSuite has become one of the most important software products of the company since its introduction 2 years ago. > > **Ulemper**: The data export and the very cumbersome and partly outdated reporting in a Word document is the biggest problem for us so far. Here, the use of the SQL Report Server with freely definable parameters would be much more suitable for us. Likewise, a graphical configuration, with drag \& drop, would be more contemporary. > > ReqSuite is mainly used at BORA for requirements management in research \& development. It is used to create requirements specifications, reusable standard requirements and project status overviews. The use of ReqSuite also ensures that standards and guidelines to be complied with are not forgotten. In the meantime, other departments such as product management and purchasing also use ReqSuite to support the technical project managers in their work on R\&D projects. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Næste: [Next page](https://www.capterra.dk/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.dk/software/162954/reqsuite) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data