--- description: Få detaljeret information om Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite fra verificerede brugererfaringer lige fra anvendelighed, egenskaber, pris, fordele og ulemper. Læs anmeldelser, og find lignende værktøjer takket være Capterra Danmark. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite: pris, anmeldelser og vurderinger – Capterra Danmark --- Breadcrumb: [Startside](/) > [Electronic Data Capture Software](/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) > [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](/software/192454/research-manager) # Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite Canonical: https://www.capterra.dk/software/192454/research-manager Page: 1 / 6\ Næste: [Next page](https://www.capterra.dk/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) > ResearchManager integrerer effektivt datamanagement (EDC, ePRO, RTSM, eConsent) og kliniske operationer (CTMS, eTMF, LIMS, RIMS). > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 118 users. Top-rated for **Sandsynlighed for anbefaling**. ----- ## Overview ### Hvem bruger Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite? En varieret vifte af over 100.000 enheder, herunder CRO'er, Pharma, Biotech, MedTech, akademiske institutioner, sundhedsudbydere og medicinske etiske komitéer/institutionelle undersøgelsesudvalg (IRBs). ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Samlet** | **4.2/5** | 118 Anmeldelser | | Brugervenlighed | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundesupport | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Værdi for pengene | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Egenskaber | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Sandsynlighed for anbefaling) | ## Om leverandøren - **Virksomhed**: Cloud9-Software - **Location**: Deventer, Nederlandene - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **Prissætningsdetaljer**: For at få en personlig prisoversigt, besøg venligst: https://my-researchmanager.com/en/pricing/ - **Target Audience**: Selvstændig, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Sky, SaaS, Web-baseret - **Supported Languages**: engelsk, nederlandsk, tysk - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algeriet, Amerikansk Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua og Barbuda, Argentina, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbajdsjan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien, Belize and 204 more ## Egenskaber - Billedbehandling af dokumenter - Billedoptagelse - Distributed Capture - Dokumentstyring - EMR/EHR - Elektronisk dataregistrering - Fjernindsamling af data - Formularstyring - HIPAA-kompatibel - Import/eksport af data - Klassifikation af dokumenter - Lagerstyring - Overholdelse af 21 CFR Part 11 - Patienthåndtering - Patientovervågning - Patientrekruttering - Planlægning - Prøvedesign - Rapportering/analyse - Revisionsspor - Styring af arbejdsgange - Styring af overholdelse - Third-Party Integrations - Økonomistyring ## Integrations (10 total) - AFAS Software - Clue - ExactSpent - Fitbit - Freestyle Solutions - Polar - Samsung SDS - Wahoo Trace - Whoop - Zwift ## Support Options - Mail/support - Ofte stillede spørgsmål/forum - Videnbase - Telefonsupport - 24-7 (live repræsentant) - Chat ## Category - [Electronic Data Capture Software](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## Relaterede kategorier - [Electronic Data Capture Software](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) - [Software til forvaltning af kliniske forsøg](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Data Entry Software](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30543/data-entry/software) ## Alternativer 1. [SurveyJS](https://www.capterra.dk/software/1063198/surveyjs) — 4.9/5 (24 reviews) 2. [Jotform](https://www.capterra.dk/software/158456/jotform-4-0) — 4.7/5 (2904 reviews) 3. [Appenate](https://www.capterra.dk/software/151223/appenate) — 4.7/5 (167 reviews) 4. [Upflowy](https://www.capterra.dk/software/1015785/upflowy) — 4.8/5 (15 reviews) 5. [Forms On Fire](https://www.capterra.dk/software/150611/forms-on-fire-mobile) — 5.0/5 (3 reviews) ## Anmeldelser ### "Excellent software" — 5.0/5 > **Bekræftet anmelder** | *2. september 2023* | Hospitals- og sundhedsvæsenet | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it. > > **Ulemper**: Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application ----- ### "Descent EDC" — 4.0/5 > **Noudjoum** | *24. juni 2026* | Lægemidler | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Fordele**: I liked the ease of use of it, the validation steps were easy and not too much complainte from the sites about data entry. The reporting is good. > > **Ulemper**: The roles \! They are all prédéfined in the system and cannot be customized, the query management is not convenient, and the customer service is in Rurope which made it difficult for urgent matters. > > I run three studies on it and the three of them run smoothly. Data entry was easy, data validation was easy too. The lock and data extraction were also straight forward. ----- ### "User-friendly system with potential for improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Marta** | *25. juni 2026* | Hospitals- og sundhedsvæsenet | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Fordele**: What I liked most about ResearchManager is that, from a monitor’s perspective, the system is quite intuitive and easy to navigate. The layout is clear and logical, which makes it relatively easy to find the necessary information. > > **Ulemper**: From a monitor’s perspective, the weakest point is that SDV can only be performed for closed visits, and only at the page level rather than for individual data points. In other systems, I have seen a more practical solution where each data point has a default status of “SDV not performed”, which can then be changed to “SDV performed” or “SDV not OK”. If “SDV performed” is selected and the site subsequently changes the entered data, the status automatically changes to “Data changed after SDV”. In my opinion, this functionality greatly facilitates monitoring and the tracking of all data changes. Another problematic aspect is the lack of possibility to raise queries in empty visits. In such cases, I have to contact the site separately by email and provide screenshots from the eCRF to indicate the missing data. It would also be very helpful if the query status were clearly visible, i.e. whether a query has already been addressed and closed or whether it still requires action. Currently, it is only visible that a query has been raised for a given parameter, but the actual status is not clear. In addition, in the query list, it would be very useful to see the specific queries linked to specific parameters, rather than only the sections in which the queries were raised. If there are many parameters and several queries, it is easy to overlook one of them. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I find the system quite intuitive and easy to work with, but I think some improvements, especially in SDV and query management, could make it even better :) ----- ### "Easy of use in multicenter trials" — 5.0/5 > **Mikko** | *24. juni 2026* | Hospitals- og sundhedsvæsenet | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Everything in order and in the same place. Easy to access form anywhere and esay to learn how to use. Makes performing a trial a lot easier. > > **Ulemper**: The automatic query, when missed filling a required field- would be nicer to remind that nort all required fields are filled yet, do you really want to "save as complete"? > > I use it regularly in a multicenter- trial as a head of corelab. Although all the parties involved are located in different countries, this no longer makes any difference. ----- ### "Efficient Clinical Research Management Platform with Strong Workflow Capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Mateusz** | *11. juni 2026* | Research | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Fordele**: The platform helps centralize study management activities in one place, improving collaboration between research teams. I particularly appreciated the document management functionality, workflow support, and the ability to track study progress efficiently. The system promotes better organization and transparency across research projects. > > **Ulemper**: The user interface can feel somewhat complex for first-time users, and some advanced functions are not immediately intuitive. Additional customization options for reports and dashboards would be beneficial. The initial setup and onboarding process may require dedicated training. > > Overall, my experience with Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite has been positive. The platform provides a comprehensive environment for managing research activities and helps streamline administrative and operational tasks. While there is a learning curve, the benefits in terms of organization, compliance support, and workflow efficiency outweigh the challenges. It is a valuable solution for research organizations seeking to improve study management processes. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ Næste: [Next page](https://www.capterra.dk/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.dk/software/192454/research-manager) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data