--- description: Få detaljeret information om Wrike fra verificerede brugererfaringer lige fra anvendelighed, egenskaber, pris, fordele og ulemper. Læs anmeldelser, og find lignende værktøjer takket være Capterra Danmark. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Wrike: pris, anmeldelser og vurderinger – Capterra Danmark --- Breadcrumb: [Startside](/) > [Projektstyringssoftware](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [Wrike](/software/76113/wrike) # Wrike Canonical: https://www.capterra.dk/software/76113/wrike Page: 1 / 123\ Næste: [Next page](https://www.capterra.dk/software/76113/wrike?page=2) > Håndtér projekter og forbedr arbejdsgange med Wrikes arbejdsstyringssoftware. Fjern barrierer, find klarhed og overgå mål. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 3037 users. Top-rated for **Sandsynlighed for anbefaling**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Samlet** | **4.4/5** | 3037 Anmeldelser | | Brugervenlighed | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundesupport | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Værdi for pengene | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Egenskaber | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Sandsynlighed for anbefaling) | ## Om leverandøren - **Virksomhed**: Wrike - **Location**: San Jose, USA - **Founded**: 2007 ## Commercial Context - **Udgangspris**: 10,00 US$ - **Prismodel**: (Free version available) (Gratis prøve) - **Target Audience**: Selvstændig, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Sky, SaaS, Web-baseret, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (Mobil), iPhone (Mobil), iPad (Mobil) - **Supported Languages**: dansk, engelsk, fransk, indonesisk, italiensk, japansk, kinesisk, koreansk, nederlandsk, norsk, polsk, portugisisk, russisk, spansk, svensk, traditionelt kinesisk, tysk, ukrainsk - **Available Countries**: Albanien, Algeriet, Amerikansk Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua og Barbuda, Argentina, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbajdsjan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien, Belize, Benin and 202 more ## Egenskaber - Aktivitetsplanlægning - Asset Lifecycle Management - Brandretningslinjer - Chat/beskeder - Dokumentoptagelse - Dokumentstyring - Finansiel analyse - Finansiel rapportering - Formgivning og design - Gennemgang af dokument - IT-indberetning - Indstillinger for indholdsudgivelse - Integreret virksomhedsdrift - Kalender/påmindelsessystem - Kalenderstyring - Kampagneplanlægning - Kampagnestyring - Kanalstyring - Kapacitetsplanlægning - Kapacitetsstyring - Kommunikationsstyring - Konfiguration af arbejdsgange - Kontraktdatabase - Logsamling - Markedsføringsautomatisering - Markedsføringskalender - Medarbejderkartotek - Multikanal-kampagner - Målstyring - Planlægning - Procesmodellering og design - Produkt-roadmapping - Projektplanlægning - Projektsporing - ROI Tracking - Ressourceplanlægning - Sikker datalagring - Sporing af fremmøde - Sporing af interaktion - Sporing af udgifter - Sprintplanlægning - Strategisk planlægning - Styring af kunder - Styring af præstationsanmeldelse - Søgning i fuld tekst - Tidsplanlægning i realtid - Tidsregistrering for projekt - Tilgængelighedsstyring - Udgiftsanalyse - Workflow Automation ... and 209 more features ## Integrations (138 total) - AWS Lambda - Adobe Campaign - Adobe Creative Cloud - Airbrake - Airtable - Amazon Cognito - Amazon Lex - Amazon S3 - Anaplan - Apache Kafka - Asana - Ascent ERP - BambooHR - Basecamp - BigCommerce ... and 123 more integrations ## Support Options - Mail/support - Ofte stillede spørgsmål/forum - Videnbase - Telefonsupport - 24-7 (live repræsentant) - Chat ## Category - [Projektstyringssoftware](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## Relaterede kategorier - [Projektstyringssoftware](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Software til samarbejde](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [PSA-software til automatisering af professionelle tjenester](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/16/professional-services-automation/software) - [Task Management Software](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Business Process Management Software](https://www.capterra.dk/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) ## Alternativer 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.dk/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15458 reviews) 2. [Asana](https://www.capterra.dk/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13644 reviews) 3. [monday.com AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.dk/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6095 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.dk/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23594 reviews) 5. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.dk/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3715 reviews) ## Anmeldelser ### "Great for Managing Product Initiatives" — 5.0/5 > **suman** | *3. juli 2026* | Uddannelsesstyring | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Wrike provides fantastic workflow customization, clear dashboard visibility, and strong reporting capabilities-enabling us to see where features are developing, and what's most important. Their collaborative features are fantastic for directly linking conversations and activity back to the right tasks. Wrike's other productivity tool integrations keep our product development moving. > > **Ulemper**: Initial setup for this platform is a time-consuming process, and users need adequate training to maximize its functionality. The interface can get cluttered, and several customization options, and advanced reporting features are only available on premium plans. > > The experience overall for myself on Wrike has been really great. I use it for task coordination with product engineering feature developemnet, organize the product road map and with many other people. All of the tasks and timelines and updates with the product development on one platform simplifies me managing the whole process. ----- ### "An Excellent Platform for Managing Campaigns and Cross-Functional Projects" — 5.0/5 > **Ojas** | *30. juli 2026* | Informationsteknologi og -tjenester | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fordele**: Wrike's intuitive project management capabilities and customizable dashboards made it easy to track tasks, manage campaigns, and collaborate across teams. The real-time visibility into project status, timelines, and dependencies helped improve efficiency and kept stakeholders aligned. I also appreciated the reporting features, which made performance tracking and resource planning much easier.Its task tracking, collaboration tools, and customizable workflows helped my team stay on schedule and communicate effectively. The platform provided excellent visibility into ongoing work and reduced the need for constant follow-ups.I found the customizable workflows, dashboards, and reporting tools particularly useful for managing complex campaigns and tracking progress in real time. It helped improve accountability, streamline communication, and ensure deadlines were met efficiently. The user-friendly interface also made adoption easy for different teams.Wrike significantly improved team collaboration, project visibility, and campaign execution efficiency, making it an essential tool for managing complex workflow. > > **Ulemper**: There isn't much to dislike, but the platform can feel overwhelming initially due to the number of features available. A simpler onboarding experience and more intuitive navigation for new users would make adoption easier. The platform has a learning curve, especially for new users. Some advanced features and customization options can feel overwhelming at first, and it can take time for teams to fully adopt and optimize the tool > > My overall experience with Wrike has been very positive. It is a robust and reliable project management platform that helps teams stay organized, collaborate effectively, and maintain visibility across projects. The ability to customize workflows, dashboards, and reports made it easy to adapt the tool to our team's specific needs. Wrike streamlined task management, improved communication among stakeholders, and provided real-time insights into project progress, helping us meet deadlines more consistently. While there is a learning curve for some of the advanced features, the benefits in terms of productivity, accountability, and project transparency far outweigh the initial setup effort. Overall, Wrike has been a valuable tool for managing complex projects and enhancing team efficiency. ----- ### "Wrike Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *8. juni 2026* | Hospitals- og sundhedsvæsenet | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **Fordele**: I like that we are able to hold team members accountable, the reporting helps make it easy to see the types of projects worked on, and that we can have other teams within the Wrike platform but they dont have access to our marketing spaces. > > **Ulemper**: They make a lot of changes with 0 to little notice. And when the changes are made the training isnt great and when we worked with our Rep she gives us incorrect information (on more than one occasion). This is why when anyone on our team has Wrike issues we submit a ticket vs reaching out to the people on our account. > > Its been fine. We enjoy the platform but have been very upset with things being discontinued, items being changed, and our representatives. We will probably reevalute the platform at the end of our contract to see if there is another one we can use. ----- ### "Our team runs on Wrike now and we have almost no issues with it" — 5.0/5 > **Anastasia** | *26. maj 2026* | Informationsteknologi og -tjenester | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fordele**: The cross-tagging is literally the first real game-changer for how our team works and so instead of having to create and maintain two separate versions of the same task/project, when something impacts both marketing and ops teams, you don’t have to duplicate anything or follow-up on multiple teams. I am beat from today and needed to write this down before i forgot about what i was saying. The Gantt view in Wrike is probably one of the better views i’ve used. The ability to drag dependencies around and have everything flow without breaking (this seems like a no-brainer), has been a pain point for many other platforms. Blueprints will likely also reduce your overall setup time if you’re creating similar types of projects, as once you get your blueprint set up correctly; you won’t be building from scratch every single time. > > **Ulemper**: I find that the dashboard builder is somewhat underwhelming relative to the power of the rest of the application. While you’ll be able to get very basic widgets into the dashboard, most of the more detailed reporting capabilities require far too much clicking and sometimes the data just doesn’t report out in the manner that you’d expect. Request forms work fine, however new users often need to be walked through where their submissions end up post-submission, as it’s not clear. It may seem minor, but the notification section becomes cluttered quickly and i haven’t found a good way to clean it out without getting into settings and adjusting the noise levels. In terms of cost structure – there isn’t a lot of flexibility with the pricing tiers. Some of the really valuable features such as time-tracking reports and automated trigger functionality are restricted by higher tier plans. > > Prior to using Wrike, we were updating project status via email chains, keeping track of tasks via spreadsheets and checking-in on project status via Slack messages — none of which were connected. Thus, each question received approximately 4 different answers in 4 different places. Now all of these questions have a central location to receive an answer and because they’re tied together (contextually) including comments, files, and historical status updates – they get completed much faster and more accurately than when they existed in someone’s email box. ----- ### "A Fantastic and Reliable Platform For Facility Maintenance" — 5.0/5 > **Amit** | *2. juli 2026* | Hospitals- og sundhedsvæsenet | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Fordele**: It is easy to use this platform and I like the real-time task tracking, reporting, and collaboration features, which improve team coordination. It also keeps maintenance on schedule. > > **Ulemper**: I haven’t had any dislikes with this platform overall, it is has easy learning curve and advanced features. > > Overall, Wrike has helped me organize facility operations and keep maintenance activities on schedule across our healthcare facilities. ----- Page: 1 / 123\ Næste: [Next page](https://www.capterra.dk/software/76113/wrike?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.dk/software/76113/wrike) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data